← Selected work案例研究
CASE 06 · CELL-LEVEL MULTIPHYSICS · S-03

In-cell temperature spread cut from 11.4 K to 4.2 K电芯内部温差从 11.4 K 降到 4.2 K

At 3C, a commercial-vehicle pack developer's 75 Ah pouch cell ran 11.4 K hotter near its tabs than at the far end, and prototype packs showed cells ageing unevenly. A 3D electro-thermal model traced the cause to current crowding at the same-side tabs. Moving to opposite-side tabs with tab cooling cut the spread to 4.2 K, and prototype cells confirmed the prediction to within 0.4 K.

某商用车电池包开发商的 75 Ah 软包电芯在 3C 下,极耳附近比远端高出 11.4 K,样包中的电芯老化也不均匀。三维电-热耦合模型把原因定位到同侧极耳处的电流集中。改为两端出极耳并增加极耳冷却后,温差降至 4.2 K;样品电芯实测与预测相差不超过 0.4 K。

11.4 → 4.2 K
IN-CELL ΔT AT 3C3C 电芯内部温差
52 → 44 °C
PEAK CELL TEMPERATURE电芯最高温度
0.4 K
MODEL RMSE, 12 THERMOCOUPLES模型误差(12 个热电偶)
18
DESIGN VARIANTS EVALUATED评估的设计方案数

01The problem问题

A temperature gradient inside a cell makes some of its electrode age faster than the rest. By Arrhenius scaling, 10 K roughly doubles the local ageing rate near the hot end. The client had already improved pack-level cooling, but that cannot fix a gradient that starts inside the cell.

电芯内部的温度梯度会让一部分电极比其余部分老化得更快——按阿伦尼乌斯规律,高温端相差 10 K,局部老化速率约翻一倍。客户已经改进了电池包层面的冷却,但源自电芯内部的温差无法靠包级冷却解决。

02What we did我们做了什么

Instrument the baseline cell为基线电芯布置测点

12 thermocouples plus IR thermography at 1C, 2C and 3C. We also measured current-collector sheet resistance and heat generation with isothermal calorimetry.

布置 12 个热电偶并配合红外热成像,测试 1C、2C、3C;同时测量集流体方阻,并用等温量热仪测量产热。

Model where the current actually flows还原电流的真实路径

The current-collector potential is solved in 2D and coupled to a 1D electrochemical model at every point. Heat conduction is 3D and anisotropic: 28 W/m·K in-plane, 0.9 W/m·K through-plane.

二维求解集流体电位分布,并在每个位置耦合一维电化学模型;三维各向异性导热(面内 28 W/m·K,厚度方向 0.9 W/m·K)。

Compare 18 variants比较 18 个方案

Variables: tab position (same side or opposite), tab width (40–80 mm), tab cooling versus face cooling, and current-collector thickness.

变量包括:极耳位置(同侧 / 两端)、极耳宽度(40–80 mm)、极耳冷却 vs 大面冷却,以及集流体厚度。

Build and measure the winner制作并实测最优方案

The client built six prototype cells of the chosen design, instrumented the same way as the baseline.

客户按选定方案制作 6 颗样品电芯,采用与基线相同的测点布置。

03Results结果

Temperature maps at 3C: baseline with same-side tabs peaks at 52 °C near the tabs; redesign with opposite tabs and tab cooling peaks at 44 °C with a flatter field.
FIG 1 · Temperature at the end of a 3C step, on the same colour scale. The baseline's hot zone sits where current converges on the tabs.图 1 · 3C 阶跃结束时的温度分布(同一色标)。基线的高温区正是电流向极耳汇聚之处。
Maximum and minimum cell temperature over a 20-minute 3C step for baseline and redesign, with prototype measurements.
FIG 2 · Temperature envelope over a 3C step. Dots are prototype-cell measurements.图 2 · 3C 阶跃过程中的温度包络;圆点为样品电芯实测值。
  • ΔT across the cell fell from 11.4 K to 4.2 K in the model; 4.6 K was measured on the prototypes. The peak fell from 52.0 °C to 44.0 °C.
  • 模型预测电芯内温差从 11.4 K 降至 4.2 K,样品实测 4.6 K;最高温度从 52.0 °C 降至 44.0 °C。
  • 0.4 K RMSE across all 12 thermocouples on the prototype cells.
  • 样品电芯 12 个热电偶上的预测误差 RMSE 为 0.4 K。
  • No energy penalty. Tab width stayed at 60 mm and the cell envelope is unchanged. The projected SOH spread across the pack after 1,500 cycles narrows from 3.1 to 1.2 points.
  • 无能量损失。极耳宽度保持 60 mm,电芯外形不变。预计 1,500 次循环后,电池包内电芯 SOH 离散度从 3.1 个百分点收窄到 1.2。

04Limits of validity适用边界

Validated for 1C–3C, coolant at 15–35 °C, and fresh cells. Heat generation in aged cells was not measured, so the pack-level SOH projection is an estimate.

已验证范围:1C–3C、冷却液 15–35 °C、新电芯。老化电芯的产热未做测量,因此电池包层面的 SOH 离散预测属于估算。

05What the client received交付内容

Calibrated 3D electro-thermal cell model
已标定的三维电-热电芯模型
Design-variant study with ranking
设计方案对比研究及排序
Tab and cooling specification
极耳与冷却规格
Instrumented test procedure for future cells
面向后续电芯的测点测试规程